Dear zine union catalog makers, We have a DRAFT of a advisory board member nomination form <https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSdQ1fIEyFlxrpZmQM9IPpRSA63n3lhjlalRQxwKlxl8byKhKg/viewform>. Will you give feedback on it? Background if you weren't on the last call or at the MIT meeting: we want a group of zine researchers and makers (not zine librarians) to give feedback on the union catalog as we go. More info on the etherpad <https://etherpad.wikimedia.org/p/zineunioncatalog>, the only August 15, 2016 meeting notes in color. One thing we didn't talk about to our memory is how we select the advisory board members once we have the nominations. Would that be the affirmed caticorn herders? People pulled form outside the ZUC working group? Some combo of the two? Consensus, majority, dog sniffing? What do y'all think? Milo & Jenna -- http://lowereastsidelibrarian.info http://zines.barnard.edu http://leslzine.storenvy.com she, her _______________________________________________ Zlunioncat mailing list Zlunioncat@lists.qzap.org http://lists.qzap.org/listinfo.cgi/zlunioncat-qzap.org